Sunday, 16 March 2014

Sharia Law in the UK: bit... by bit... by bit...

First posted: 28 August 2011

Ask yourself this question:

When will all this kneeling down to ‘Islamic sensitivities’ and demands come to end? 


The answer is simple: 


When we live in a sharia-based society. When we all submit to an Islamic state (or to Allah). 


Of course, most Muslims start with the small things. Then they will argue for the bigger things. The majority of UK Muslims would - and will - not demand full sharia today, compulsory jihad service or a mosque for every 100 Muslims. But this is not Muslim moderation. It is Muslim common sense. It is Islamic realpolitik or even real-taqiyya


Why ask for the big things when you know they will be rejected – or at the least, be watered down? Why demand large-scale changes when such demands may work against the spread of Islam in the longer term? That is, be careful what you ask for. If Muslims ask for the stoning of adulterers, the UK backlash would be massive. Thus most Muslims will not ask for such a thing. It would be counterproductive to do so. Muslims are taking it relatively easy. And least the majority are. The Islamocrazies, of course, want their full cake today. They like being outré. It’s quite chic. 


So, instead, Muslims demand many and various small things. They know that many small separate concessions and accommodations will soon add up to a single big thing (when given enough time). 


One day I woke up to view the multicultural world I had battled for and I saw a sharia-governed world instead. Multicultural society had become an Islamic society. 


This man did not see all this coming. All he saw, from day to day, were the small accommodations or concessions to Muslims. Things like single-sex swimming baths, halal meat, more mosques, mega-mosques, Muslim organisations and community leaders gaining more power and influence, non-Muslim women being forced to wear the hijab in Muslim areas or in Islamic buildings, etc. 


Blacked-out windows in a swimming bath, or even halal meat at non-Muslim schools, may seem a little inconsequential to the Islamic enablers. But it is one of very many small accommodations or concessions to Muslims. It is also yet another symbolic victory. These victories are what matter to the members of a war-like religion - even if the concession itself is not that important. It is the victory that is important. The more Islamic victories the better; even the victory of being allowed to pray in the street in Blackburn. 


The state, the police, UK councils, politicians, etc. don’t seem to be worried about all these accommodations or concessions. After all, these people haven’t worried about all the other accommodations or concessions. And we still aren’t living in a sharia-governed society. So what’s there to worry about? 


More importantly, however, these pious people want to bring about more ‘community cohesion’. They want us to ‘embrace diversity’. (They also want us to ‘embrace cohesion’ and create ‘community diversity’.) Or at least the big knobs do. The ones at the top. The ones who admired Tony Blair and whose faith is that of Political Correctness. The ones who don’t want to upset PC MPs and PC councillors. Police leaders like Chris Sims of the West Midlands Police who wrote an article against the English Defence League and told us how nice Unite Against Fascism (UAF) is. Or the ones who say such PC things to further their careers or keep themselves in their jobs. Many must also be frightened of the Government and councillors, etc. keeping an eye on their levels of political correctness. 


Is the latest concession or accommodation a ‘victory for multiculturalism’? No. It is a victory for Islam and Muslims. Full stop. More than that: it's a victory for biculturalism not multiculturalism. For Muslims-against-the-rest. Other ethnic minorities are actually a part of ‘the rest’ because they don’t get their way as often as Muslims do. Indeed they don’t demand as much as Muslims do. They do not see themselves as a special category which should receive special accommodation from the state and from local councils. 


It is the Muslim self-created ghettoisation that is partly responsible for this unquenchable thirst for accommodation and concession. And what is accommodated or conceded is not usually part of the British landscape.


The more separate Muslims become, the more they will demand. The more they will both expect and demand. These demands will of course become more aggressive and much more frequent. 


*) Here’s a short - mainly American - list of various accommodations and concessions which I discovered on the Internet. 

*) Sell land at discount prices for building mosques or other Islamic institutions (Dudley!!).
*) Ban Hindus and Jews from a jury hearing a criminal case against an Islamist in Great Britain.
*) Allow a prisoner the unheard-of right to avoid strip-searches in New York State.
*) Let students in public (i.e., taxpayer-funded) schools use empty classrooms for prayers in New Jersey.
*) Permit public schools and public airwaves to be used to convert non-Muslims.
*) Recognize polygamous marriages for tax purposes in the United Kingdom.
*) Set aside women-only bathing at a municipal swimming pool in France or use taxpayer funds for Muslim women-only swimming times in Washington State.
*) Arrange for women-only classes at a taxpayer-supported university.
*) Blame women for being the victims of rape by Muslim men in Norway.
*) Develop a special hijab for female Muslim employees of a leading home furnishing company, sporting the corporate logo.
*) Ban the use of piggybanks - the symbol of frugality in their advertising by two major British banks.
*) Establish panels, councils, or advisory boards uniquely for Muslims.
*) Authorize Muslim-only neighbourhoods or events.
*) Apply the "Rushdie rules" accepting Islamist intimidation and silencing critics of Islam.
*) Punish anti-Islamic views through the application of criminal charges, as has occurred to critics of Islam in Australia and Canada.
*) Prohibit families from sending pork or pork by-products or "Any matter containing religious materials contrary to Islamic faith" to U.S. military personnel serving in the Middle East.
*) Require that female American soldiers in Saudi Arabia wear U.S. government-issued abayas.
*) Secure a charter from the New York City Department of Education to open an Arabic-themed public school.
*) Lead Muslim students in prayer at a public San Diego elementary school.
*) Allow women in Ohio, California, and New York to have their drivers license photos taken with hijabs on.
*) Designate the port of Rotterdam as compliant with Sharia law.
*) Construct Islamic toilets at the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland.
*) Construct prayer facilities in public bathrooms at the University of Michigan's Dearborn campus.
*) Appoint a "special envoy" of the United States government to the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC).
*) Compel teachers and students to don Muslim garb to mark the end of Ramadan. 
*) Forward plans to dig up portions of an historic London cemetery to make space for a "multi-faith" (i.e. Muslim) graveyard.
*) Allow cab drivers in Vancouver, B.C. to refuse certified guide dogs for reasons of religious conviction.
*) Admonish doctors and nurses in Scotland to refrain from eating in front of their Muslim patients and colleagues during the month of Ramadan.
*) Propose that people of all faiths refer to God as Allah to "create more dialogue." 
*) Match couples through arranged marriages on a public television dating show.
*) Allow Muslim sex offenders in Great Britain to opt out of a prison treatment program because it is "against Islamic teachings to discuss your offence to anyone."

No comments:

Post a Comment